In the race toward Net Zero, most companies have made significant progress on their direct emissions. They've switched to renewable energy, optimized their facilities, and upgraded their fleets. Yet despite these efforts, they're barely making a dent in their overall carbon footprint.

Why? Because the real elephant in the room isn't what happens inside company walls—it's what happens across the entire value chain.

‍

According to the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), Scope 3 emissions account for a staggering 11.4 times a company's total emissions. That's not a typo. For every ton of carbon your operations produce directly, your supply chain is responsible for more than eleven tons. Yet despite this enormous impact, Scope 3 targets made up only 15% of all new or in-progress emissions reduction targets, highlighting a critical gap between ambition and action.

‍

This gap isn't just an environmental concern, it's rapidly becoming a business risk. With regulations like the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and California's Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (CCDAA) coming into force, companies can no longer afford to treat Scope 3 as an afterthought.

‍

The Perfect Storm: Why Scope 3 Has Become Unavoidable

As of January 2024, CSRD requires over 50,000 large EU and US companies with eligible EU subsidiaries to disclose detailed sustainability data, including Scope 3 emissions from their supply chains. Starting in 2026, CBAM will impose carbon tariffs on imports of materials like steel and cement, forcing companies to track the carbon content and origins of their materials with unprecedented precision.

‍

California's CCDAA has mandated that large companies disclose their full greenhouse gas emissions, including Scope 1, 2, and 3, starting in 2026, demonstrating growing appetite for strict corporate climate regulation in the United States. Failure to properly measure Scope 3 emissions could lead to significant fines, making accurate reporting and supply chain transparency crucial for regulatory compliance.

‍

But regulations are only part of the story. Investors, customers, and consumers are demanding transparency at the product level. They want to know not just that your company is "green," but exactly how much carbon is embedded in the specific products they're buying or investing in.

‍

Why Scope 3 Is So Hard to Tackle

If measuring Scope 3 emissions is so critical, why haven't more companies cracked the code? The challenge lies in three fundamental obstacles:

‍

Poor Data Quality and Fragmented Processes: Scope 3 assessments typically rely on inconsistent and incomplete data from multiple sources across global supply chains. When you're dealing with thousands of suppliers across dozens of countries, each with their own systems and standards, getting accurate emissions data feels like herding cats.

‍

Low Supplier Engagement: Many suppliers, especially smaller ones, lack the tools, expertise, or incentives to share reliable emissions data. They're often overwhelmed by multiple customer requests for sustainability information, each using different formats and methodologies. Without their participation, your Scope 3 measurements remain guesswork.

‍

Rapidly Evolving Regulatory Landscape: Regulations vary by region and change frequently. What meets compliance standards in one jurisdiction may fall short in another. Companies find themselves chasing moving targets, struggling to build systems that can adapt to new requirements.

‍

The Measurement Maturity Ladder: Where Does Your Company Stand?

Here's an uncomfortable truth: most companies are stuck at the bottom of the Scope 3 measurement maturity ladder, using methods that are fundamentally inadequate for driving real change.

Level 0: The Spend-Based Trap

The most basic approach, and unfortunately still the most common, is spend-based measurement. This method takes the financial value of purchased goods and services and multiplies it by industry-average emission factors to estimate carbon impact.

‍

It's appealingly simple, but dangerously misleading. The spend-based method assumes all goods in a category have identical emissions intensity. Under this logic, buying steel from a supplier powered by renewable energy produces the same carbon calculation as buying from a coal-powered facility. It treats all suppliers in an industry the same, regardless of their actual environmental performance.

‍

Worse, this method doesn't provide actionable insights. Knowing your "retail" or "logistics" spending has high emissions doesn't tell you which specific suppliers or processes to target. Companies trapped in spend-based measurement often draw the wrong conclusion: that reducing spending is the path to reducing emissions. This creates perverse incentives that undermine both business growth and genuine sustainability progress.

‍

Moving Up: Activity-Based and Hybrid Approaches

More sophisticated companies have moved to activity-based measurement, which uses specific operational data like mass of goods purchased, distances traveled, or volumes consumed. This approach provides much more accurate and targeted insights into emission hotspots.

The hybrid method takes this further by combining primary data from key suppliers with secondary industry data for less significant categories. According to the GHG Protocol, this involves collecting Scope 1 and 2 emission data directly from suppliers, along with detailed activity data about materials consumed, distances traveled, and waste produced.

‍

Level 3: The Gold Standard

The most advanced approach is Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) calculation, which measures environmental impact throughout a product's entire life cycle. This is the domain of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), involving comprehensive data collection and precise emission factors for every stage of production and distribution.

‍

It's challenging and resource-intensive, but increasingly necessary. PEF provides the granular insights needed to identify which raw materials, manufacturing processes, or transportation routes offer the greatest reduction opportunities.

‍

The Surprising Data Gap

According to a Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) survey, only 6% of companies use supplier-specific emissions factors for calculating Scope 3 emissions. This means 94% of companies are working with data too generic to drive meaningful action.

‍

To fulfill real decarbonization commitments, companies need access to granular, product-level emissions data. Without it, they're flying blind, unable to pinpoint hotspots, identify opportunities, or meaningfully engage suppliers in reduction efforts.

‍

Real Companies, Real Results

Some pioneering companies are showing what's possible when you get Scope 3 measurement right.

Take Reckitt, the global health, hygiene, and nutrition products company. With Scope 3 emissions representing 96% of their total footprint, they knew traditional measurement approaches wouldn't cut it. They set an ambitious target: reduce Scope 3 emissions by 50% by 2030 and achieve Net Zero by 2040.

‍

In 2023, Reckitt collected over 300,000 data points to refine its baseline. By leveraging advanced analytics and AI capabilities, they moved from measuring 333 representative products to analyzing all 25,000 of their products individually. For one brand alone, they went from 18 representative products to 2,190 unique items, quadrupling the number of emission factors used.

‍

The result? In under four months, they improved the accuracy of their emissions footprint by 75 times. More importantly, this granular data revealed specific, actionable pathways to reduce emissions by 2030, insights that were completely invisible with cruder measurement approaches.

The Economist Group offers another compelling example. Despite already achieving a 30% reduction since their 2020 baseline, surpassing their 25% science-based target, they recognized that with Scope 3 representing 98% of their total footprint, there was no path to credible Net Zero without tackling supply chain emissions.

‍

By adopting product-level data collection from their top 50 suppliers and integrating emissions tracking into procurement processes, they've made Scope 3 reduction a shared priority across their organization and supply base. Emissions data is now reported to their Board with the same rigor as financial metrics, ensuring leadership accountability.

‍

The Supplier Engagement Imperative

Here's what successful companies understand: you can't reduce Scope 3 emissions without bringing your suppliers along for the journey. This requires moving beyond one-off data requests to building genuine partnerships focused on shared reduction goals.

‍

The most effective approach involves segmenting suppliers based on both their carbon impact and their sustainability maturity, then tailoring engagement strategies accordingly. High-impact, mature suppliers can be challenged with aggressive reduction targets and collaborative innovation projects. High-impact suppliers with lower maturity need education and support to build their capabilities.

Companies implementing structured supplier engagement frameworks are achieving an additional 15-20% reduction in Scope 3 emissions beyond what their initial targets projected. But this requires infrastructure—centralized platforms to track supplier progress, standardized methodologies to ensure data comparability, and clear incentives to drive participation.

‍

From Measurement to Action

Getting accurate Scope 3 data is just the beginning. The real value comes from turning that data into strategic decisions. Which alternative materials could dramatically reduce product footprints? Which manufacturing processes offer the biggest opportunities for efficiency gains? Which suppliers should you invest in developing versus which should you phase out?

‍

One automotive manufacturer working toward Net Zero in Scope 3 by 2040 faced the challenge of engaging thousands of buyers across 20 countries with a network of 50,000 suppliers. By establishing a single source of truth for sustainability data and training 1,500 buyers on emissions impacts, they identified 120 decarbonization levers for key commodities like steel, aluminum, and batteries—enabling potential reductions of up to 55% by 2030.

What's Next for Your Organization?

The companies winning on Scope 3 share common characteristics: they've moved beyond basic spend-based estimates, they've invested in supplier engagement infrastructure, they've integrated carbon metrics into procurement decisions, and they've established clear accountability for supply chain emissions.

‍

But the journey from where most companies are today to where they need to be isn't simple. It requires understanding the full spectrum of measurement methodologies, knowing how to validate supplier data, building effective engagement strategies, and leveraging the right technology platforms to operate at scale.

‍

‍

Ready to Transform Your Scope 3 Strategy?

‍

This blog post only scratches the surface of what's possible when companies get serious about Scope 3 decarbonization. Our comprehensive guide goes deeper into:

• Detailed frameworks for each measurement maturity level, helping you chart the path from where you are to where you need to be
• Step-by-step supplier engagement methodologies tested with leading global corporations
• Complete case studies showing exactly how companies like Reckitt, The Economist Group, and others achieved breakthrough results
• A systematic approach to supplier data verification ensuring the information you collect is accurate and actionable
• Practical implementation roadmaps for different industries, from manufacturing to media
• Technology platform requirements and capabilities you'll need to operate Scope 3 programs at scale

Whether you're just starting your Scope 3 journey or looking to accelerate progress on existing initiatives, this guide provides the methodologies, insights, and real-world examples you need to turn your supply chain from your biggest climate challenge into your greatest competitive advantage.

Download the complete Scope 3 Decarbonization Guide and discover how to move from measurement to meaningful impact.

‍